| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, Murray Prior Hobbs <murray(at)efone(dot)com>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems |
| Date: | 2002-01-20 22:17:57 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0201201709400.712-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Tom Lane writes:
> I'm still quite nervous about making these changes so late in the cycle.
> OTOH I suspect Andreas was right: we haven't been getting any pltcl
> portability testing from our beta testers.
This logic can also be reversed: We haven't been getting any beta testing
from users of Red Hat 7.1.
> If it's broken now, we can hardly make it worse.
You can surely make things a lot worse for those that are using other
operating systems. I certainly don't agree with making changes just
because Red Hat blew it.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-01-20 22:25:40 | Re: Confusing terminology |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-01-20 21:54:23 | Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-20 22:52:07 | Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-20 21:43:45 | Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |