Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, Murray Prior Hobbs <murray(at)efone(dot)com>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems
Date: 2002-01-20 21:12:45
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0201201611190.712-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

Tom Lane writes:

> Peter, didn't you have a proposal on the table to fix this?

Yeah, complain loudly to whoever dared to package a broken Tcl like
that... Or we'll work with Andreas Zeugwetter's patches and eliminate the
use of tclConfig.sh mostly.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-20 21:33:30 Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-01-20 21:11:01 Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-20 21:33:30 Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-01-20 21:11:01 Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu