Re: VPATH builds fail

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VPATH builds fail
Date: 2002-01-08 22:57:43
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0201081743000.725-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> There is *no* difference in the #include commands, but apparently the
> #line directives affect gcc's default search path for include files.

I was kind of baffled myself why it worked at all.

> Net result: I'm back to my original statement: VPATH builds will not
> work with a source distribution tarball. Any objections to the
> -I$(srcdir) trick?

Nope.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-01-08 22:59:23 ECPG warning
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-08 22:48:58 Re: Strange results with date/interval arithmetic