Re: pg_dump: Sorted output, referential integrity

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Christof Petig <christof(at)petig-baender(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump: Sorted output, referential integrity
Date: 2001-12-12 22:25:21
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0112121937400.627-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck writes:

> We don't want to define the constraints with ALTER TABLE
> because this means checking data on restore that doesn't need
> to be checked at all (in theory). If he has a crash of a
> critical system and restores from a dump, I bet the farm that
> he wants it FAST.

Um, if he has a *crash* of a *critical* system, doesn't he want his data
checked before he puts it back online?

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-12-12 22:25:41 Re: Explicit configuration file
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-12-12 22:24:33 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/doc/src/sgml Makefile cvs.sgml datatype. ...