From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: <application> vs <command> |
Date: | 2001-11-30 18:13:05 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0111292149190.609-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Can someone clarify when we should use <command> and when we should use
> <application>? I see postmaster used with application, but psql and
> createdb used with command. Is this correct?
From "DocBook: The Definitive Guide":
| Command -- The name of an executable program or other software command
|
| This element holds the name of an executable program or the text of a
| command that a user enters to execute a program.
| Application -- The name of a software program
|
| The appelation "application" is usually reserved for larger software
| packages--WordPerfect, for example, but not grep. In some domains,
| Application may also apply to a piece of hardware.
One could think of psql as a separate "application", but postmaster is
certainly a command only.
I'm not sure why, given the definition, <command> is put out in bold.
Monospaced would make more sense to me. <application> could be a remote
candidate for bold.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-12-01 14:03:25 | Re: <application> vs <command> |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-11-30 18:12:19 | Re: <application> vs <command> |