| From: | Stuart Robinson <stuart(at)zapata(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG vs MySQL |
| Date: | 2001-11-21 19:26:01 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0111211122120.2565-100000@dreamingameric.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
For what it's worth, I'm one of those people who switched from mySQL to
PostgreSQL. Why? Because the latter has a number of capabilities that the
former is lacking, chief among these being:
1. transactions
2. views
3. subqueries
Andrey Shcherbina wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm sure this question was asked before but I can't find the answer.
> >
> > I've just started looking at options of runnnig Linux-based (actually, I
> > need something free :) database engines with MS Access as a front-end. I
> > can't find any comparison between PostgreSQL and MySQL. It seems so far
> > that PG is better (people tend to migrate to PG, not vice versa) and
> > that's why I'm asking this question on PG newsgroup but not on MySQL.
> > Anyway, it would be really nice to have that information on what exactly
> > is different in the engines.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Andrey Shcherbina
--
Stuart Robinson [stuart(at)zapata(dot)org]
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-21 20:09:04 | Re: Default conversion of type numeric to text in 7.1.3 |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2001-11-21 19:03:14 | Re: [PATCHES] Version checking when loading psql |