| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: beta3 |
| Date: | 2001-11-18 17:17:41 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0111181805590.613-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> The packaging problems need to be solved before we can build a release
> candidate --- but I don't see why they should hold up beta3. beta2 has
> the same problems, so beta3 wouldn't be a regression.
Considering the history of how-do-we-get-the-docs-in-the-tarball problem,
I'd like to see at least one beta where this works before shipping a
release candidate. Otherwise I'll have no confidence at all that we're
not going to ship the final release with last year's docs and no man
pages.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-11-18 17:17:49 | Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-11-18 17:17:24 | Re: TODO item inquiry/claim |