From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 7.2b1 ... |
Date: | 2001-10-26 18:41:16 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0110262035280.628-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier writes:
> CVS tags have been conssitent since v7.1 ...
Allow me to consider that a joke:
REL7_2_BETA1
REL7_1_STABLE
REL7_1_BETA3
REL7_1_BETA2
REL7_1_BETA
REL7_1_2
REL7_1
So,
Where is REL7_1_1? Where is REL7_1_BETA1? What does REL7_1_BETA belong
to? What ever happened to beta4 thru beta6 or so, and rc1 through rc3?
What is the CVS tag for 7.2b1? What release is the tag REL7_2_BETA1 for?
And if there is a 7.2b1, where is 7.2a1? And do you realise that in the
GNU tradition, a release 7.2b would be a beta release leading to 7.3?
And I won't even start talking about the names of the ChangeLog files
which are fortunately gone.
All of this requires just a minute of thought and will save countless
people a headache.
Please.
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier writes:
> >
> > > ... is now packaged ... mirrors will pick it up soon, but if anyone wants
> > > to do a quick check, its in /pub/beta ...
> >
> > What ever happened to 7.2beta1?
> >
> > Sorry, but the inconsistency in naming of releases and CVS tags (if ever
> > there would be any) is driving me nuts.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Ford | 2001-10-26 19:37:05 | Re: [patch] helps fe-connect.c handle -EINTR more gracefully |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-10-26 14:46:23 | Re: [patch] helps fe-connect.c handle -EINTR more gracefully |