From: | Arguile <arguile(at)lucentstudios(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | New default ignored by pre-exising insert rulesets. |
Date: | 2001-10-24 15:38:38 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0110241136500.6031-100000@nghost.vosn.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
If PostgreSQL failed to compile on your computer or you found a bug that
is likely to be specific to one platform then please fill out this form
and e-mail it to pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)
To report any other bug, fill out the form below and e-mail it to
pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)
If you not only found the problem but solved it and generated a patch then
e-mail it to pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org instead. Please use the command
"diff -c" to generate the patch.
You may also enter a bug report at http://www.postgresql.org/ instead of
e-mailing this form.
============================================================================
POSTGRESQL BUG REPORT TEMPLATE
============================================================================
Your name : arguile
Your email address : arguile(at)lucentstudios(dot)com
System Configuration
---------------------
Architecture (example: Intel Pentium) : Intel P3 Xeon
Operating System (example: Linux 2.0.26 ELF) : Linux 2.2.19smp
PostgreSQL version (example: PostgreSQL-7.1.3): PostgreSQL-7.1.3
Compiler used (example: gcc 2.95.2) : gcc 2.95.3
Please enter a FULL description of your problem:
------------------------------------------------
SYNOPSIS:
If a table field is altered to add a default, the default value is
bypassed by pre-existing rules.
DETAILS:
Let's say we have an employee (overused yes, but bear with me) table and
any changes to it are logged in a seperate table. The changes are logged
via a bunch of RULEs.
CREATE TABLE foo (id int);
CREATE TABLE log (id int, date timestamp);
CREATE RULE foo_insert AS
ON INSERT TO foo DO
INSERT INTO log (id) VALUES (new.id);
We insert a value and the rule is doing it's job.
INSERT INTO foo (id) VALUES (1);
Tracking changes is all well and good but when they occured would be
useful so a a timestamp field is added and is given the default of now().
ALTER TABLE log ALTER date SET DEFAULT now();
We then insert another record into the main table,
INSERT INTO foo (id) VALUES (2);
and are suprised to find out there's no timestamp in the date field. Just
to test we insert a value directly into the log table, then another into
our main table.
INSERT INTO log (id) VALUES (3);
INSERT INTO foo (id) VALUES (4);
At this point we'd expect the log to contain:
id | date
----+------------------------
1 |
2 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00-00
3 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00-00
4 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00-00
Instead the INSERT in the RULE seem to somehow bypass the default value
and we get this:
id | date
----+------------------------
1 |
2 |
3 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00-00
4 |
It didn't happen quite like that but you get the drift. As a side note, if
you add a NOT NULL contraint to the date (I know it's a SQL reserved word
but this is an example ;) field _that_ will be honoured and the system
will complain. It just seems to like ignoring defaults set after the fact.
Thanks for your time.
Please describe a way to repeat the problem. Please try to provide a
concise reproducible example, if at all possible:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- This doesn't work
DROP TABLE foo; DROP TABLE log;
CREATE TABLE foo (id int);
CREATE TABLE log (id int, date timestamp);
CREATE RULE foo_insert AS
ON INSERT TO foo DO
INSERT INTO log (id) VALUES (new.id);
INSERT INTO foo (id) VALUES (1);
ALTER TABLE log ALTER date SET DEFAULT now(); -- alter after rule
INSERT INTO foo (id) VALUES (2);
INSERT INTO log (id) VALUES (3);
INSERT INTO foo (id) VALUES (4);
SELECT * FROM log;
-- This does work
DROP TABLE foo; DROP TABLE log;
CREATE TABLE foo (id int);
CREATE TABLE log (id int, date timestamp);
ALTER TABLE log ALTER date SET DEFAULT now(); -- alter before rule
CREATE RULE foo_insert AS
ON INSERT TO foo DO
INSERT INTO log (id) VALUES (new.id);
INSERT INTO foo (id) VALUES (1);
INSERT INTO foo (id) VALUES (2);
INSERT INTO log (id) VALUES (3);
INSERT INTO foo (id) VALUES (4);
SELECT * FROM log;
If you know how this problem might be fixed, list the solution below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I find 'em not fix 'em. :)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Breton | 2001-10-24 16:15:06 | Possible bug in Postgres String comparison routines |
Previous Message | Nicola Larosa | 2001-10-24 13:38:57 | Decimal digits in timeofday() |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Antonio Sergio de Mello e Souza | 2001-10-24 15:51:53 | Index on wide column |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-10-24 15:23:47 | Re: [GENERAL] Using an SMP machine to make multiple indices on the same |