| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration |
| Date: | 2001-10-23 20:41:36 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0110232221220.642-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Barry Lind writes:
> If we can include the ANT libraries in our CVS then my
> objection to ANT (requiring users to trackdown and download ANT) goes
> away, and I would then suggest we continue to use ANT for the other
> reasons you mention.
My problem with Ant isn't primarily the availability or what's standard or
not. My problem is simply that it doesn't work the way I want the build
system to work (see recently listed issues such as exit status and
multiple build dirs). If we can get these fixed then I have no problem,
but otherwise Ant introduces bugs into the build system and those will be
fixed, no matter what's the standard today.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Barry Lind | 2001-10-23 21:17:10 | Re: JDBC issues for JDK1.4 |
| Previous Message | Gunnar Rønning | 2001-10-23 19:44:13 | Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration |