Re: Bytea string operator support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bytea string operator support
Date: 2001-09-13 23:58:05
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0109140156170.680-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian writes:

> I agree this is type pollution into libpq but I don't see another option
> except having the user code this stuff into their application. Maybe we
> need some type-handling library in the future were we can put all this
> stuff. Maybe we can add this to libpq now and create a separate library
> when we need one.

We probably do. After all, the strings you get are not really the most
optimal form, especially for numbers, dates, and booleans. Looks at the
JDBC spec, they have getXXX for each data type.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas O'Dowd 2001-09-14 10:09:16 Re: Patch to add bytea support to JDBC
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-09-13 18:10:31 Re: SQLCODE==-209