Re: syslog by default?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: syslog by default?
Date: 2001-09-12 12:07:40
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0109121402310.694-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii writes:

> Why are you so worrying about finding syslog() in configure? We have
> already done lots of function testings. Is there anything special with
> syslog()?

All the other functions we test for come with a replacement plan. Either
we choose between several similar alternatives (atexit/on_exit), or we
link in our own function.o file. But we don't shut off a whole piece of
functionality when one goes missing (except in the cases I mentioned).

I'm probably being paranoid. But you did ask what became of the idea, and
that's what did, as far as I'm concerned...

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomasz Myrta 2001-09-12 12:22:18 dynamic-static date
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2001-09-12 10:23:19 Re: enable-unicode-conversion option?