From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Dr(dot) Evil" <drevil(at)sidereal(dot)kz>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Random strings |
Date: | 2001-08-08 19:21:09 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0108082119310.692-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway writes:
> Per the discussion yesterday, here's a patch. There are two versions of
> essentially the same function. They both take an int as the number of
> requested random bytes, and generate a random binary string of the requested
> length from /dev/urandom. The first one (randomstr_hex) converts the binary
> to hex and returns it as text, and the other (randomstr_bytea) does the
> needed escaping of special characters and returns bytea.
Perhaps one of these returning bytea would be enough and you can use
the new encode functions to convert them to a format of choice. Also, why
aren't you using /dev/random?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-08 19:21:53 | Re: [GENERAL] Bug with ALTER TABLE |
Previous Message | Allan Engelhardt | 2001-08-08 19:13:24 | Re: Re: Still wondering about random numbers... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anders Bengtsson | 2001-08-08 20:03:40 | JDBC Statement cleanup patch |
Previous Message | Allan Engelhardt | 2001-08-08 19:13:24 | Re: Re: Still wondering about random numbers... |