Alex Pilosov writes:
> > I'm not so convinced on that idea. Assume you're dropping object foo.
> > You look at pg_depend and see that objects 145928, 264792, and 1893723
> > depend on it. Great, what do you do now?
> I believe someone else previously suggested this:
>
> drop <type> object [RESTRICT | CASCADE]
>
> to make use of dependency info.
That was me. The point, however, was, given object id 145928, how the
heck to you know what table this comes from?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter