From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Ola Sundell <ola(at)miranda(dot)org>, Mike Finn <mike(dot)finn(at)tacticalExecutive(dot)com>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Metadata for tables, schema, and numeric |
Date: | 2001-07-05 16:20:55 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0107051816470.677-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Tom Lane writes:
> While I haven't read the JDBC spec, I'd have to guess that the entire
> notion of an updateable result set is defined only for a very small
> subset of possible SELECT queries
FYI:
| Due to differences in database implementations, the JDBC API does not
| specify an exact set of SQL queries which must yield an updatable result
| set for JDBC drivers that support updatability. Developers can, however,
| generally expect queries which meet the following criteria to produce an
| updatable result set:
|
| 1. The query references only a single table in the database.
| 2. The query does not contain any join operations.
| 3. The query selects the primary key of the table it references.
|
| In addition, an SQL query should also satisfy the conditions listed
| below if inserts are to be performed.
|
| 4. The query selects all of the non-nullable columns in the
| underlying table.
| 5. The query selects all columns that don't have a default value.
I would argue that a minority of all queries in real life statisfy 1.
through 3, in addition to the restriction of not using functions.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | egcs | 2001-07-06 02:15:58 | Where have the laterest jdbc driver fro download ? |
Previous Message | Gunnar Rønning | 2001-07-05 10:23:27 | Re: Re: [INTERFACES] New code for JDBC driver |