| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "J(dot)H(dot)M(dot) Dassen (Ray)" <jdassen(at)cistron-office(dot)nl>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages |
| Date: | 2001-06-29 16:14:49 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0106291807410.867-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Oliver Elphick writes:
> "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" wrote:
> >> and it was never submitted to us a a patch.
> >
> >According to the README it was. Oliver, could you comment on this please?
>
> It was, a couple of months back. Peter made some criticism of its use of
> autoconf, which I have changed. I have not resubmitted the patch because
> the core team seemed to think it was not sufficiently portable. If people
> want to include it in the main release, I will resubmit a revised patch.
The whole authentication process has been rewritten in the meantime, so
you might have some work to do. I think the patch was okay in principle.
It's not any less "portable" than ident when you don't have an ident
server running.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas T. Veldhouse | 2001-06-29 16:31:22 | Re: |
| Previous Message | Janning Vygen | 2001-06-29 16:01:55 | another stupid question: Database is being accessed by other users |