From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Felipe Carasso <hrimhari(at)tecgraf(dot)puc-rio(dot)br> |
Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Full backup |
Date: | 2001-06-20 20:36:28 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0106202231430.725-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Felipe Carasso writes:
> It would be very nice, in my opinion, if the pg_dumpall tool could
> include all system tables in the dump, possibly checking for superuser
> access before doing that. It seems that only pg_shadow is added.
There is hardly ever a reason to save the full content of the system
catalogs, because the "standard" content would be added back by initdb and
the local modifications are saved by pg_dump in the form of CREATE
SOMETHING commands. At least that *should* be the case. Is there a
particular case you are having trouble with?
> Also, it seems that pg_dumpall is unable to pass the -F flag to
> the sucessive calls to pg_dump.
That would be nice, but it's tricky to work out how to make sure you can
restore everything in one piece. As it is, you could have a piece of text
file from pg_dumpall proper and a bunch of compressed archives or some
such created by the pg_dumps. Maybe pg_dumpall needs to be taught about
the several formats that pg_dump now offers.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-06-20 20:49:38 | Re: Re: pg_dump dumps views as tables??? |
Previous Message | Jeremy Buchmann | 2001-06-20 20:32:14 | Re: openBSD |