From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_stats view added to CVS tip |
Date: | 2001-06-16 15:39:37 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0106161737370.755-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> The view also tries to be slightly more user-friendly than a raw look at
> pg_statistic. It joins to pg_class and pg_attribute to get the names of
> tables and columns, and it presents the various kinds of statistics
> intelligently labeled. (Thus, the view has wired into it exactly the
> sort of assumptions we agreed not to make in pg_statistic itself.
> Peter E. may be unhappy with me here. But it seems to me that we can
> change/extend the view definition when we add new kinds of statistics
> entries.)
For informational views this is okay AFAICS; the SQL information schema is
full of this kind of thing. When you want to present alternative
information you add a new column and return null in the old ones.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-16 15:46:58 | Re: postgres dies while doing vacuum analyze |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-06-16 14:38:02 | Re: UNIQUE INDEX unaware of transactions (a spin of question) |