From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patch to include PAM support... |
Date: | 2001-06-13 15:18:30 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0106131718130.756-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> This seems to fit into the "wait for the perfect fix" solution which I
> don't think applies here. There is no saying that a PAM patch will even
> be around once we get the rest working.
>
> Basically, we have some people who want it. Now we need to hear from
> people who don't want it. I have a "no" from Tom and a "yes" from
> "Peter E" (and the author).
Not in the current form.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-13 15:31:13 | Re: Patch to include PAM support... |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-13 15:07:11 | Re: Re: REPLACE INTO table a la mySQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-13 15:31:13 | Re: Patch to include PAM support... |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-06-13 14:54:48 | Re: Patch to warn about oid/xid wraparound |