From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee> |
Cc: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: reset all update |
Date: | 2001-06-12 20:05:29 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0106122204590.756-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Marko Kreen writes:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:37:43PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Marko Kreen writes:
> > > *** src/backend/tcop/postgres.c 2001/06/07 04:50:57 1.219
> > > --- src/backend/tcop/postgres.c 2001/06/11 09:17:07
> > > + ctx = IsUnderPostmaster ? PGC_BACKEND : PGC_POSTMASTER;
> > > +
> >
> > This is wrong. If you're in PostgresMain then the context is PGC_BACKEND
> > -- by definition.
>
> Well, but how do you explain this: (line 1463 in current CVS):
>
> /* all options are allowed if not under postmaster */
> SetConfigOption(name, value,
> (IsUnderPostmaster) ? PGC_BACKEND : PGC_POSTMASTER, true);
>
> As I understand, when you run ./postgres directly, you get
> PGC_POSTMASTER, which includes PGC_BACKEND.
You're right. Objection withdrawn. ;-)
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-12 20:26:17 | Re: Patch to include PAM support... |
Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2001-06-12 20:03:10 | Re: reset all update |