Re: Databases compared at zend.com

From: <pgsql-general(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
Cc: Michael <mwaples(at)waples(dot)net>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Databases compared at zend.com
Date: 2001-06-01 18:04:23
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0106011103100.1356-100000@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Good article. The only inaccuracy I saw was that he claims Postgres'
> storage of large objects is "in the filesystem" and "inefficient".
> >From my reading of the docs this is not true--large objects are stored
> within the database just as with any other data. The programming
> interface to LOs may or may not be clunkier than that of other
> databases, but the storage is no less efficient.

As the person who wrote it :) It was my understanding that PostgreSQL
stores large objects on the filesystem outside of the database tables.
They may be indexed but I thought there was only an identifier within the
table that pointed to the large object.

If this is not true, could someone please describe the actual process, I
can update the article.

Joshua Drake

>
> I thought about posting a comment on the article, but I didn't feel
> like registering at Yet Another Website in order to do so.
>
> -Doug
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-01 18:14:40 Re: Can't restart postmaster!
Previous Message pgsql-general 2001-06-01 18:02:49 Re: Databases compared at zend.com