From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Klimov <ask(at)wisdom(dot)weizmann(dot)ac(dot)il> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Where `gcc -MMD' puts .d files |
Date: | 2001-05-08 16:57:06 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0105081841010.759-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alexander Klimov writes:
> The point is that I do use gcc 2.95.2, and it puts .d file in the curent
> directory, not to the directory there files come from. Anyway, my patch
> solve the problem at least for me.
I see the problem, the port/Makefile needs some changes because it's
trying to put output files outside the current directory. Try this patch:
diff -c -r1.28 Makefile.in
*** Makefile.in 2000/12/11 00:49:54 1.28
--- Makefile.in 2001/05/08 16:42:20
***************
*** 22,29 ****
include $(top_builddir)/src/Makefile.global
OBJS = dynloader.o @INET_ATON@ @STRERROR@ @MISSING_RANDOM@ @SRANDOM@
! OBJS+= @GETHOSTNAME@ @GETRUSAGE@ @STRCASECMP@ @STRDUP@ @TAS@ @ISINF@
OBJS+= @STRTOL@ @STRTOUL@ @SNPRINTF@
ifeq ($(PORTNAME), qnx4)
OBJS += getrusage.o qnx4/SUBSYS.o
endif
--- 22,32 ----
include $(top_builddir)/src/Makefile.global
OBJS = dynloader.o @INET_ATON@ @STRERROR@ @MISSING_RANDOM@ @SRANDOM@
! OBJS+= @GETHOSTNAME@ @GETRUSAGE@ @STRCASECMP@ @TAS@ @ISINF@
OBJS+= @STRTOL@ @STRTOUL@ @SNPRINTF@
+ ifdef STRDUP
+ OBJS += $(top_builddir)/src/utils/strdup.o
+ endif
ifeq ($(PORTNAME), qnx4)
OBJS += getrusage.o qnx4/SUBSYS.o
endif
***************
*** 56,61 ****
--- 59,68 ----
tas.o: tas.s
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $<
+
+ $(top_builddir)/src/utils/strdup.o:
+ $(MAKE) -C $(top_builddir)/src/utils strdup.o
+
distclean clean:
rm -f SUBSYS.o $(OBJS)
===snip
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kovacs Zoltan | 2001-05-08 17:30:19 | Re: incorrect query result using complex structures (views?) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-05-08 16:55:37 | Re: Is `#!/bin/sh' configurable? |