Re: Problems with new DBD

From: "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net>
To: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Glen Eustace <geustace(at)godzone(dot)net(dot)nz>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Glen Eustace <geustace(at)godzone(dot)net(dot)nz>
Subject: Re: Problems with new DBD
Date: 2001-04-19 12:55:42
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0104190854560.22140-100000@chapelperilous.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Justin Clift wrote:

> Which of these patch is "better"? I'd like to include this this on the
> techdocs.postgresql.org website with a patch for it.
>
> Just have to know which one to include.

Actually, I think Jeff's has a minor fix to it, so use the one he posted.

-- Brett
http://www.chapelperilous.net/btfwk/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sacred cows make great hamburgers.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boban Acimovic 2001-04-19 13:07:59 Performances using --with-perl
Previous Message Grzegorz Mucha 2001-04-19 12:35:35 Postgres and Unicode