Re: age() function documentation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: age() function documentation
Date: 2001-04-11 16:14:15
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0104111813390.1201-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart writes:

> I notice that the docs have commented-out all mention of the age()
> functions, with the note that "These two functions don't seem to do what
> it says here, or anything reasonable at all for that matter."
>
> ??
>
> How did we conclude that, and how could these be confusing? I do not
> recall any discussion on the topic, and I'll restore the documentation
> until someone can refresh my memory on why these are a problem.
>
> <grumble>

http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-hackers/2001-02/msg00550.html

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Butler 2001-04-11 16:48:49 Re: Index type promotion
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-04-11 16:09:38 Re: age() function documentation