| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "'Lamar Owen'" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: AW: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC |
| Date: | 2001-04-09 16:18:37 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0104091816550.1255-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zeugswetter Andreas SB writes:
> > However, 7.1beta6 to 7.1rc4 to 7.1.0 would be an ok
> > progression, as 7.1 < 7.1.0, I think (saying that without having tested it could be
> > dangerous.... :-)).
>
> I like this 7.1.0, it would also help to clarify what exact version is at hand.
> People tend to use shorthands like 7.1 to refer to any patch version (like 7.1.3).
I like that. In fact, we almost shipped a 7.0.0 but it was switched back
at the last minute because that's how it always was. Perhaps the
objection is that a 7.1.0 would indicate that there will be a 7.1.1 bug
fix release, but let's not kid ourselves.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-04-09 16:28:53 | Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-04-09 16:13:19 | Re: Yellow Dog Linux/PPC regression |