From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Jean-Roch SCHMITT <jean-roch(dot)schmitt(at)cybercable(dot)fr> |
Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: base/1 instead of base/template1 initdb result |
Date: | 2001-04-06 14:44:55 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0104061642060.1603-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Jean-Roch SCHMITT writes:
> I can't find any reports on this problem :
> On MacOS X (darwin), the initdb command creates, as the template, the
> "base/1" directory
> intead of "base/template1". Further databases creation is then possible
> but this odd directory
> naming prevents correct pg_upgrade operations from Postgres databases
> created on Solaris, for instance.
Firstly, this is the correct new naming scheme in PostgreSQL (on any
platform).
Secondly, it wouldn't be possible to use pg_upgrade between different
architectures anyway.
Thirdly, it wouldn't be possible to use pg_upgrade to move from 7.0 to 7.1
anyway.
Fourthly, pg_upgrade no longer exists.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jie Liang | 2001-04-06 17:37:18 | Does pg_dump stable on v7.0 |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2001-04-06 14:34:33 | Re: 7.1 out soon? |