Re: RE: Compiling

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>
Cc: Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RE: Compiling
Date: 2001-03-29 18:37:39
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0103292036160.2091-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Marko Kreen writes:

> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:50:04AM +0100, Peter Mount wrote:
> > At 13:04 27/03/01 +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > >On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:54:15AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> > > > 3) currently we seem to have a build process that is 99% Ant and 1% make
> > > > (for 4 substitutions). It seems unnecessarily complex to add make when we
> > > > can remove it completely and not lose any functionality.
> > >
> > >Peter E, Peter M: how about build.xml.in, where the needed
> > >substitutions are done in configure end-phase? I can prepare
> > >patch if this is acceptable.
> >
> > For me that would be a good idea (remember there are three build.xml files)
> > - it's just that I don't know enough about autoconf to do it myself :-)
>
> The .xml.in was not needed. I solved it using java.util.Properties
> format file src/build.cfg.in where the parameters are specified.

I think this is a good approach. Details can be worked out when we open
up 7.2.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Skidmore, Walt 2001-03-29 18:41:37 More Timestamp issues...
Previous Message Pattabi Raman 2001-03-29 17:55:33 JDBC2.0 Support