Re: Re: Call for platforms

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, <thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com>, <hxpro(at)cinesite(dot)co(dot)uk>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <segfault(at)hardline(dot)org>, <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov>, <tih(at)kpnQwest(dot)no>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms
Date: 2001-03-22 16:30:46
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0103221729560.1208-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker writes:

> How much 'diviation' are we allowing for?
>
> Solaris x86/7 results, for example, in geometry.out, show a difference of:
>
> 1.53102359078377e-11,3 (expected)
> 1.53102359017709e-11,3 (results)
>
> or
>
> 3,-3.06204718156754e-11 (expected)
> 3,-3.06204718035418e-11 (results)
>
> acceptable diviation?

Practically yes, technically not. Check if the geometry results match any
of the other "expected" files so we can update the "resultmap". See

http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/regress-platform.html

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-22 16:33:38 Re: Re: Call for platforms
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-22 16:29:27 Re: Call for platforms

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-22 16:33:38 Re: Re: Call for platforms
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-22 16:29:27 Re: Call for platforms