| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Are <sect3>'s displayed in TOCs? |
| Date: | 2001-03-16 16:06:34 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0103161704400.1293-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Roberto Mello writes:
> I am almost done with the PL/pgSQL doc revamping.
>
> Are <sect3>'s displayed in tables of contents?
Not the way we have it set up, although it could be changed. However,
this makes the ToC unreasonably long in many cases, so I'd hesitate to
change it, at least now.
> I have <sect3>s that
> would be much more appealing and useful to readers if they were displayed
> in the TOCs.
> If <sect3>'s won't be displayed, would it be ok for me to re-structure
> some PL/pgSQL topics into <sect1>s with <sect2>s ?
This is probably the best approach anyway. Too many "important" sect3's
make the page too long.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-03-16 17:31:38 | Re: Revamped PL/pgSQL Documentation |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2001-03-16 09:37:28 | Re: Re: [SQL] Contribute to the PL/pgSQL CookBook !! |