Re: Re: Fast Inserts and Hardware Questions

From: Alex Howansky <alex(at)wankwood(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Fast Inserts and Hardware Questions
Date: 2001-03-16 21:53:22
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0103161545280.14467-100000@net-srv-0001.bvrd.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> [Interesting stats]
>
> > Wow, does WAL make so much of a difference as to make my
> > two-generations-old, built-from-spare-parts scrap box faster than my
> > latest and greatest production server? Yikes!
>
> What RAID level are you running? RAID-5 isn't always very
> fast on writes. That and WAL might be what's up.

Yes, it is RAID-5 on the big box. Unfortunately, I don't have any spare RAID
equipped boxes sitting around, so I can't experiment with the different RAID
levels. Still, you'd think that even a "slow" RAID-5 configuration would be
faster than a $98 IDE drive...

> Have you tried 7.1b5 on the big box?

Not yet, I'm waiting for a quiet weekend. I'll post my stats when (if...) I get
around to doing that.

--
Alex Howansky
Wankwood Associates
http://www.wankwood.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Crotwell 2001-03-16 22:00:51 pgdump, large objects and 7.0->7.1
Previous Message Ron Chmara 2001-03-16 21:28:22 Re: ssl connections with psql