Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Date: 2001-03-15 19:43:28
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0103152039540.826-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alfred Perlstein writes:

> Sorry, what's a GUC? :)

Grand Unified Configuration system

It's basically a cute name for the achievement that there's now a single
name space and interface for (almost) all postmaster run time
configuration variables,

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-15 19:45:46 Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Previous Message Alfred Perlstein 2001-03-15 19:40:14 Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC