Re: Performance monitor

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Justin Clift <aa2(at)bigpond(dot)net(dot)au>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance monitor
Date: 2001-03-08 21:54:31
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0103082246360.1061-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> How many of our supported platforms actually have working ps-status
> code? (This is an honest question: I don't know.)

BeOS, DG/UX, and Cygwin don't have support code, the rest *should* work.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-08 22:06:13 Re: Performance monitor
Previous Message Nathan Myers 2001-03-08 21:33:50 Re: Use SIGQUIT instead of SIGUSR1?