| From: | "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thierry Besancon <Thierry(dot)Besancon(at)prism(dot)uvsq(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | <gianpaolo(at)preciso(dot)net>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: binding postmaster to *one* virtual IP address |
| Date: | 2001-02-20 15:30:40 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0102201024580.23757-100000@chapelperilous.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 20 Feb 2001, Thierry Besancon wrote:
> Nope but thanks.
>
> I think that should be builtin in the application and should not rely
> on other parts of the system.
>
> I'm trying to figure out how to add a new option to do that.
> If not already scheduled in 7.1, is it of any interest for 7.1 ?
You can control access to postgres on an IP basis using the pg_hba.conf.
That is probably the best way to do it.
-- Brett
http://www.chapelperilous.net/~bmccoy/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparing information and knowledge is like asking whether the fatness
of a pig is more or less green than the designated hitter rule."
-- David Guaspari
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-20 15:32:21 | Re: vacuum analyze again... |
| Previous Message | Jose Manuel Lorenzo Lopez | 2001-02-20 15:29:34 | Installing DBI client |