From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Richard <poboxcanada(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Annotatable on-line documentation |
Date: | 2001-02-16 20:38:20 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0102162134140.1009-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
Richard writes:
> Would this lighten the work load on the folk that are
> currently maintaining the docs? Would it lighten the
> work load for the core developers? Would it stimulate
> the development of richer documetation? Would it draw
> some of the load off the mailing lists?
My concerns are mostly that that kind of thing would be abused as a
discussion forum, the quality of the comments is quite low on average, and
the added efforts to weed out the posts on a regular basis seem
prohibite.
I don't see any particular advantage coming from this that couldn't be
achieved in another way.
> A pilot project may be enlightening. Anyone have
> experience with setting up/maintaining annotatable
> on-line documentation?
What I've seen at PHP and MySQL was enlightening enough for me. :-(
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-02-17 02:29:14 | Re: Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle vs DB2 vs MySQL - Which should I use? |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-02-16 20:28:53 | Re: Annotatable on-line documentation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-16 20:58:22 | Re: How to use gethostbyname() |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-02-16 20:28:53 | Re: Annotatable on-line documentation |