From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | George Johnson <gjohnson(at)jdsc(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: two cents |
Date: | 2001-02-10 09:44:08 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0102101040440.775-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
George Johnson writes:
> Reading the 20 or so Re's to NFS issues as well as the last few months of
> list watching, as well as my own crash experience etc, what is the current
> direction/state of things regarding backup, replication etc with postgresql?
> Do you foresee pg_dump being used in the long term? It is sounding like
> people are screaming for an automated, reliable way/state for shifting data
> out of the database. Or a "hot copy" function.
Backup will probably stay pg_dump's domain indefinitely. It has a "hot
copy"/snapshot/consistent dump capability, it can be automated, and we'd
like to think that 7.1's incarnation is a lot more reliable, too.
Eventually, maybe even in the 7.2 release, WAL based backups will be
available as well.
Replication is available at www.erserver.com. A stripped
down/introductory version (so I understand) is in contrib/rserv in 7.1.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kogotkov, Vyacheslav | 2001-02-10 10:54:50 | RE: can't run pg_dump in sh script using crontab |
Previous Message | Dan B | 2001-02-10 08:10:17 | Trigger using function written in PL/PGSQL returns "Unrecognized language specified" |