From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Open 7.1 items |
Date: | 2001-01-25 16:37:08 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0101251730390.1136-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> FOREIGN KEY INSERT & UPDATE/DELETE in transaction "change violation"
You're certainly not going to want to fix this now after having stared at
it for a year? It's not trivial.
> Usernames limited in length
Yeah, they are. ;-)
If this is referring to pg_passwd, I just had a closer look and it's
really a desaster. Both password and username as well as line length and
file length (in lines) have arbitrary limits, sometimes not even
consistent ones. To fix this to a point where one is confident that
everything works one essentially would have to rewrite the whole thing.
> Does pg_dump preserve COMMENTs?
Sure
> Fix ipcclean on Linux
Consider it done.
> Merge global and template BKI files?
Not this release.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-01-25 16:49:51 | RE: Permissions on CHECKPOINT |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2001-01-25 16:31:56 | new version of contrib-intarray |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter T Mount | 2001-01-25 17:07:53 | Re: Re: [INTERFACES] BIT type still not working |
Previous Message | Peter T Mount | 2001-01-25 13:38:06 | Re: JDBC buggy in 7.1beta3 |