Re: re-instalation

From: "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Martin A(dot) Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: re-instalation
Date: 2001-01-20 21:34:05
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0101201631140.4421-100000@chapelperilous.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> > The problem with just moving your database to the new location is that
> > there are location dependencies built into it when you use initdb to
> > initialize it, so it's not reliable.
>
> AFAIK, there are *not* any location dependencies in a standard PG
> database (other than path names associated with alternate database
> locations, if you are so foolish as to use hard-wired alternate-location
> pathnames). So in theory Martin should have been able to tar up the
> entire $PGDATA tree and move it somewhere else. I'm not sure why he's
> reporting a problem, but I don't think that's it.

Ah, right... I misunderstood and thought he had also changed to a
different version because of OS incompatilities. Never mind. :-)

-- Brett
http://www.chapelperilous.net/~bmccoy/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vax Vobiscum

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-01-20 21:43:37 Re: [HACKERS] Re: re-instalation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-20 21:09:44 Re: re-instalation

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2001-01-20 21:43:09 Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-20 21:09:44 Re: re-instalation