Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AI X

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "'thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com'" <thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com>, <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Pete Forman <pete(dot)forman(at)westerngeco(dot)com>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AI X
Date: 2001-01-17 16:53:03
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0101171752060.1054-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas SB writes:

> > I do not have the original thread where Andreas describes the behavior
> > of mktime() on his machine. Andreas, can you suggest a simple configure
> > test to be used?
>
> #include <time.h>
> int main()
> {
> struct tm tt, *tm=&tt;
> int i = -50000000;
> tm = localtime (&i);
> i = mktime (tm);
> if (i != -50000000) /* on AIX this check could also be (i == -1) */
> {
> printf("ERROR: mktime(3) does not correctly support datetimes before 1970\n");
> return(1);
> }
> }

You don't need to put this check into configure, you can just do the check
after mktime() is used.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert E. Bruccoleri 2001-01-17 16:57:57 Re: Re: Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2001-01-17 16:08:57 Re: renaming indices?