Re: fatal error - different CATALOG_VERSION_NO

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Thomas T(dot) Thai" <tom(at)minnesota(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fatal error - different CATALOG_VERSION_NO
Date: 2001-01-14 12:04:26
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0101141303320.977-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thomas T. Thai writes:

> $ Waiting for postmaster to start up...FATAL 2: database was initialized
> with CATALOG_VERSION_NO
> 200012280,
> but the backend was compiled with CATALOG_VERSION_NO 200101061.
> looks like you need to initdb.

> do i have to follow the upgrade procedures?

Yes

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-01-14 12:10:26 Re: performance hit with --enable-debug
Previous Message Lark 2001-01-14 11:04:56 Does PostgreSQL support Dynamic SQL?