From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ... |
Date: | 2001-01-12 00:03:12 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0101120056140.1080-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-announce pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker writes:
> > > ChangeLogs is meant to be more detailed then HISTORY, for those that would
> > > like to see results similar to 'cvs log', but without cvs access ...
> >
> > In that case it would be more useful (and customary) to put the complete
> > ChangeLog (since the beginning of time) into *one* file called
> > 'ChangeLog'. (The version bumps will be apparent since some file will be
> > changed to reflect it.)
>
> Thought of that, tried it, the resultant file was *humongous* with all of
> the TODO changes and such ... what I included was a cvs2cl.pl of just
> those changes since REL7_1 was tag'd, with a manual cleaning of the "TODO
> updated" lines ...
Those that like to see something similar to 'cvs log' are surely not
interested into just the changes since beta 1 but at least since the
branch from 7.0. If we're going to have a new changelog file for each
subrelease-to-subrelease then it's not going to be useful. Maybe make
ChangeLog_7_1, later ChangeLog_7_2, then ChangeLog_7_3 and remove
ChangeLog_7_1, so you make a reasonable compromise between storage space
and preserving the traditional nature and functionality of ChangeLogs.
Should be under doc/ too, I think.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-12 00:19:58 | Re: PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ... |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-01-11 23:25:15 | Re: PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-12 00:03:15 | Re: How to tell if that UPDATE worked? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-11 23:58:32 | Re: exit status 26 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2001-01-12 00:18:08 | RE: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! |
Previous Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2001-01-11 23:59:42 | RE: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! |