From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_restore options issues |
Date: | 2001-01-07 16:02:53 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0101071700100.1150-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oliver Elphick writes:
> I don't like that; it will need to be escaped with \ or the shell will
> substitute the contents of the current directory for the *.
>
> Why not use `-t all'
Because there might be a table called "all". (Okay, there could be a
table called "*", but really...)
> or `-A'?
We'd need an option letter for tables, triggers, indexes, functions, etc.
> You should also change the help text a bit:
>
> -t [table], --table[=table] dump for this table only
>
> gives no hint that omitting `=table' will restore all tables.
Okay, when we decide how to handle it.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-01-07 16:50:42 | Re: A post-7.1 wish-list. |
Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2001-01-07 13:42:16 | Re: pg_restore options issues |