Re: GNU readline and BSD license

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Date: 2000-12-30 00:08:18
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0012300101480.822-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker writes:

> Is there a reason *not* to move towards that for v7.2 so that the
> functions we are making optional with readline are automatic? Since we
> could then ship the code, we could make it a standard vs optional
> "feature" ...
>
> My thought would be to put 'make history feaure standard using libedit'
> onto the TODO list and take it from there ...

In my mind this is a pointless waste of developer time because there is no
problem to solve here. I'm sure we all have better things to do than
porting libedit to a dozen systems and then explaining to users why the
tarball is bloated and their carefully composed readline configuration
doesn't work anymore.

If there is something functionally wrong with Readline then let's talk
about it, but let's not replace it with something because some PHP dude
said that RMS said something.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alfred Perlstein 2000-12-30 00:09:47 Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-12-29 23:59:49 Re: how do i store \0 inside a text attribute?