Re: GEQO status?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GEQO status?
Date: 2000-12-23 00:30:40
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0012230122210.1505-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ed Loehr writes:

> What is the status of the genetic algorithm query optimizer? Is this
> supposed to work well on many-table joins, or has it fallen out of favor
> or in disrepair? [I'm needing to optimize some large, many-table-join
> queries and wondering time spent configuring/understanding geqo would be
> fruitful...]

I've seen a number of bug reports that would indicate to me the GEQO works
less than perfectly. I vividly recall how, while working on my own code,
mere additions of dummy clauses like '... AND 5=5' altered query results
in seemingly random ways. That was admittedly quite a while ago, but the
GEQO code hasn't changed since. I'd advise you to be *very* careful.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-23 00:37:40 Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-12-23 00:11:13 Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs