From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> |
Cc: | pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GEQO status? |
Date: | 2000-12-23 00:30:40 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0012230122210.1505-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ed Loehr writes:
> What is the status of the genetic algorithm query optimizer? Is this
> supposed to work well on many-table joins, or has it fallen out of favor
> or in disrepair? [I'm needing to optimize some large, many-table-join
> queries and wondering time spent configuring/understanding geqo would be
> fruitful...]
I've seen a number of bug reports that would indicate to me the GEQO works
less than perfectly. I vividly recall how, while working on my own code,
mere additions of dummy clauses like '... AND 5=5' altered query results
in seemingly random ways. That was admittedly quite a while ago, but the
GEQO code hasn't changed since. I'd advise you to be *very* careful.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-23 00:37:40 | Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-12-23 00:11:13 | Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs |