From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | SQL keywords |
Date: | 2000-12-15 23:29:16 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0012160010410.1319-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
The section on SQL keywords in the User's Guide needs some updating.
I figured that I could generate these various lists of reserved and
non-reserved keywords automatically --- and indeed I can!
But now I've got 36 lists of keywords (all the set differences between
SQL92 reserved/non-reserved, SQL99 reserved/non-reserved, PG
reserved/non-reserved (which is a simplification)) -- none of which are
empty (some keywords where dropped from reserved to non-reserved between
SQL92 and 99) -- but that's more than anyone wants to know.
But does anyone know what they do want to know?
The list of PostgreSQL reserved words seems to be the only thing I can see
as definitely essential. But which is more important: The list of words
that are reserved in PG but *not* reserved in SQLxx (i.e., what problems
can I expect when porting stuff to PG), or the opposite (i.e., what words
should I avoid when writing portable SQL).
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2000-12-15 23:38:01 | Re: SQL keywords |
Previous Message | Ivan =?iso-8859-1?q?Hern=E1ndez?= | 2000-12-15 10:13:00 | there isn't figure |