RE: Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL ?

From: "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net>
To: Matthew <matt(at)ctlno(dot)com>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL ?
Date: 2000-12-11 07:45:47
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0012110240370.3456-100000@chapelperilous.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Matthew wrote:

> > I agree that the key developers shouldn't spend much time on such a
> > thing, but on the other hand this isn't a project that requires a key
> > developer to get done. If Matthew or someone else feels like spending
> > time on it, I wouldn't object...
> >
> [Matthew] I agree also, I didn't mean to imply that a core
> developer work on it. I was just asking if this was a project that would
> interest people. If it has enough demand I would get started on it. I
> don't know a whole lot about mysql, but getting a function list and
> comparing it to postgre shouldn't be too hard.

Ah, ok, I misunderstood your intention.

You know what also would be good? A guide to porting from MySQL to
PostgreSQL, like a mini-HOWTO or something along those lines. I've done
some MySQL development (although I was using PostgreSQL even before I knew
MySQL existed, believe it or not), so I would be willing to help in this
endeavour.

-- Brett
http://www.chapelperilous.net/~bmccoy/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get forgiveness now -- tomorrow you may no longer feel guilty.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Elmar Haneke 2000-12-11 07:52:10 Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL?
Previous Message Matthew 2000-12-11 06:54:28 RE: Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL ?