From: | "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Matthew <matt(at)ctlno(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL ? |
Date: | 2000-12-11 07:45:47 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0012110240370.3456-100000@chapelperilous.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Matthew wrote:
> > I agree that the key developers shouldn't spend much time on such a
> > thing, but on the other hand this isn't a project that requires a key
> > developer to get done. If Matthew or someone else feels like spending
> > time on it, I wouldn't object...
> >
> [Matthew] I agree also, I didn't mean to imply that a core
> developer work on it. I was just asking if this was a project that would
> interest people. If it has enough demand I would get started on it. I
> don't know a whole lot about mysql, but getting a function list and
> comparing it to postgre shouldn't be too hard.
Ah, ok, I misunderstood your intention.
You know what also would be good? A guide to porting from MySQL to
PostgreSQL, like a mini-HOWTO or something along those lines. I've done
some MySQL development (although I was using PostgreSQL even before I knew
MySQL existed, believe it or not), so I would be willing to help in this
endeavour.
-- Brett
http://www.chapelperilous.net/~bmccoy/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get forgiveness now -- tomorrow you may no longer feel guilty.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Elmar Haneke | 2000-12-11 07:52:10 | Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL? |
Previous Message | Matthew | 2000-12-11 06:54:28 | RE: Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL ? |