From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: F_SETLK is looking worse and worse... |
Date: | 2000-12-10 18:10:29 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0012101903120.1095-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Removing 10-day-old files from /tmp seems pretty broken to me, and I
> hate to code around broken stuff.
(It's not 10-day-old files, it's files that have not been used for 10
days.)
But both the Linux file system standard and POSIX 2 have requirements
and/or recommendations that call for /tmp to be cleaned out once in a
while. If you don't like that, put your files elsewhere. We're not in a
position to dictate system administration procedures.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-10 18:18:17 | Re: Strange behavior of PostgreSQL on Linux |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-10 18:08:02 | Unknown-type resolution rules, redux |