| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Billy G(dot) Allie" <bga(at)mug(dot)org>, "Arno A(dot) Karner" <karner(at)tnss(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5 |
| Date: | 2000-12-04 17:31:17 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0012041825180.787-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> I ask because we recently pulled "#define DISABLE_COMPLEX_MACRO" from
> port/sco.h, on the grounds that various people were seeing more harm
> than good from it. But I'm suddenly wondering whether those people
> might've been using gcc.
We can be fairly certain that they weren't, unless GCC started accepting
SCO's compiler flags (or someone altered the compiler flags and filed a
*very* incomplete bug report).
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2000-12-04 17:33:07 | Re: Using Threads? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-12-04 17:24:29 | Re: Postgresql on dynix/ptx system |