| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE? |
| Date: | 1999-12-18 16:13:11 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.9912181448280.356-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1999-12-18, Tom Lane mentioned:
> (Actually, it's not clear to me why the postmaster log should get
> these entries at all; for the most part it's just waste of log
> space to send EXPLAIN outputs to the log...)
Maybe it shouldn't be a notice in the first place?
Actually, something unrelated (must have been the notices popping up in
the regression tests) led me to the idea of redirecting notice output into
the regular query output channel in psql, which would make it subject to
the pager if you have one set up. That would help those complaining about
100s of lines coming down their terminal. On my todo list.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 1999-12-18 16:13:17 | Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 1999-12-18 13:06:56 | Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE? |