Re: Commercial binary support?

From: "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Austin Gonyou <austin(at)coremetrics(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, eg(at)cybertec(dot)at
Subject: Re: Commercial binary support?
Date: 2003-11-22 17:44:42
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0311221744040.13011-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19 Nov 2003, Robert Treat wrote:

> I don't think *we* thought it was a hot button issue.. at least I
> certainly didn't when I initially responded. There is no need for you to
> apologize, in fact, I'll apologize for the list, we sometimes get a
> little heated on -hackers. Hopefully you've not been to startled by this
> outburst :-)

Some people have obviously lead a sheltered 'net existence :)

--
Nigel Andrews

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-22 17:48:52 Re: Commercial binary support?
Previous Message Nigel J. Andrews 2003-11-22 17:43:20 Re: Commercial binary support?