From: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
Cc: | PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: State of Beta 2 |
Date: | 2003-09-12 21:29:15 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0309122225080.12401-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 10:50, Andrew Rawnsley wrote:
> > Small soapbox moment here...
> >
> > ANYTHING that can be done to eliminate having to do an initdb on
> > version changes would make a lot of people do cartwheels. 'Do a
> > dump/reload' sometimes comes across a bit casually on the lists (my
> > apologies if it isn't meant to be), but it can be be incredibly onerous
> > to do on a large production system. That's probably why you run across
> > people running stupid-old versions.
>
> And this will become even more of an issue as it's PG's popularity
> grows with large and 24x7 databases.
And dump/reload isn't always such a casual operation to do. I initialise a
database from dump but I have to fiddle the sql on the reload to make it work.
The odd thing is I never thought it a bug, just something to work around, until
someone else has been persuing it on the list as one (it's the create schema
thing).
--
Nigel J. Andrews
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-09-12 21:59:21 | Re: State of Beta 2 |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-09-12 21:22:58 | Re: PostGreSql database features questions |